Persistent Identifier
|
doi:10.11587/AYUJTC |
Publication Date
|
2022-08-04 |
Title
| European Constitutional Court Network Data (OA edition) |
Alternative Title
| Zitationsnetzwerk zu Europäischen Verfassungsgerichten |
Author
| Lechner, Lisa (University of Innsbruck) - ORCID: 0000-0001-6690-1029
Kirchmair, Lando (University of Salzburg) - ORCID: 0000-0002-1924-1352 |
Point of Contact
|
Use email button above to contact.
AUSSDA (The Austrian Social Science Data Archive) |
Description
| Full edition for public use. Constitutions contain the most important rules of our political systems and Constitutional Courts are the most powerful judicial institutions of European states. They are the guardians of the Constitutions and ensure, for instance, the respect for fundamental rights. Since the 20th century their importance is ever growing, which attracted a lot of interest from academia and beyond. Yet, despite numerous investigations, we know little about how and to what extent different Constitutional Courts cite each other. The dataset at hand informs about the number of citations per year across national European constitutional courts, the European Court of Human Rights as well as the European Court of Justice. The respective dataset is relational and measures how frequently and when a specific court cites another court as well as how frequently and when a specific court gets cited by another court. |
Subject
| Social Sciences |
Keyword
| Law and justice (ELSST)
Constitutions (ELSST)
Content analysis (ELSST)
European Court of Human Rights (ELSST)
European Court of Justice (ELSST)
European integration (ELSST)
Treaties (ELSST)
Courts (ELSST)
Court cases (ELSST)
Legal procedure (ELSST - The European Language Social Science Thesaurus) https://elsst.cessda.eu/id |
Topic Classification
| Legislation and legal systems (CESSDA Topic Classification) https://vocabularies.cessda.eu/vocabulary/TopicClassification |
Related Publication
| Kirchmair, L. & Lechner, L. (2020). Was heißt und zu welchem Ende betreibt man juristische Netzwerkanalyse? Eine neue Methode in der Verfassungsrechtsvergleichung. Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 75(4), 773-800. doi: 10.33196/zoer202004085701 https://www.doi.org/10.33196/zoer202004085701
Kirchmair, L. (2021). Citata non verba. Warum die am häufigsten selbst-zitierte Entscheidung des VfGH (VfSlg 8.009/1977) zu seinen Gelungensten gehört. Zeitschrift für Öffentliches Recht, 76(1), 61-65. doi: 10.33196/zoer202101006101 https://www.doi.org/10.33196/zoer202101006101 |
Language
| English |
Contributor
| Researcher : Staudinger, Isabel
Researcher : Martinz, Melanie
Researcher : Kessler, Julian
Researcher : Berger, Georg
Researcher : Ezechiele, David
Researcher : Hofer, Simon
Researcher : Ivanusch, Christoph
Researcher : Müller, Michael
Researcher : Schmidt, Roland
Researcher : Schwaderer, Christian
Researcher : Tammelleo, Jimi
Researcher : Weiler, Sarah
Researcher : Wichmann, Miriam |
Funding Information
| go!digital next generation programme of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW): GDNG_2018-008_ECCN |
Distributor
| The Austrian Social Science Data Archive |
Depositor
| University of Innsbruck; University of Salzburg |
Time Period
| Start Date: 1945 ; End Date: 2018 |
Date of Collection
| Start Date: 2019-01-25 ; End Date: 2022-05-31 |
Data Type
| Numeric |
Data Source
| Registers/Records/Accounts: Legal |